Gone Girl: So, about that ending…


Ben Affleck in David Fincher's Gone Girl, 2014.

Rosamund Pike and Ben Affleck star in David Fincher’s Gone Girl, 2014.

I first picked up Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl earlier this year. It was an impulse buy at an airport, a read for the flight, a book I’d read some good reviews for and figured was worth checking out.

Let me tell you, I can’t remember the last time I read through an entire novel so rapidly.  From beginning to end, Gone Girl is a spellbinding, cutthroat page turner. Dark, vicious, morbidly funny and utterly brilliant, Gone Girl is an absolute must-read. The movie, which I saw on opening night last week, is also excellent.  The direction is slick, the story is faithfully adapted, and the acting is phenomenal. When I say that it’s not quite on the same level as the book, I don’t mean to diminish the movie’s impact; it’s just that the book is so damn good, and the story—particularly the infamous plot twist—is simply more effective as a novel than as a film.

Anyway.  After meditating on both the film and the novel, I feel it’s time that we talk about some things—and by things, what I’m really referring to is that chilling climax.  Yes, the ending. What else?

So, to be safe, here’s the necessary SPOILER WARNING!






The ending of Gone Girl has always been controversial, and now that the movie has exposed a whole new legion of formerly innocent bystanders to Flynn’s dark, cutthroat bestseller, that controversy has only expanded. Though rumors throughout production implied that Flynn, who also wrote the movie’s script, was going to change the ending, the final movie stayed true to the book. While the framing of the ending was slightly altered, the ending itself was faithful. And, like it or not, we all know what that ending is:

Amy’s final manipulation is to get pregnant, and so she and Nick stay together. After all the violence and heartache, Amy wins. Or does she?

It’s a remarkably cold, uncomfortable ending, no doubt. When I first read it, my initial reaction was discomfort, followed by bewildered confusion. That was it? The ending leaves the reader with a sick feeling in his/her stomach, and a seeming lack of resolution.

But the more I thought of it, the more I realized that Gone Girl’s controversial ending is shockingly perfect. I’d go so far as to say that, based on what we know of the story’s two protagonists, it’s the only way it could end.


Let’s face it, both of these two characters are horrible spouses, but also horribly suited for each other. Nick is naïve, simple, fraught with desperate and needy self-consciousness, and he’s clearly a bit of a narcissist; though he isn’t inherently dangerous, there’s nothing in Nick’s world but Nick. Amy, of course, can only be described as an equally narcissistic, cunning, brilliant psychopath. She knows what she wants, and she doesn’t care who she has to maim, injure or ruin in order to get it. She plans things out to such an extent that it’s almost impossible for anyone to find a loophole.

As Gillian Flynn said herself, in an interview about the subject:

What did you want to accomplish with the ending?

First of all, I didn’t write it as an open ending to set up a sequel at all. It was the only thing that made sense to me, that made sense to what was true to the book and true to the characters. Amy’s not going to end up in jail. She’s Amazing Amy! You’re never going to find the aha! clue because she thinks she’s already thought of everything and that’s who she is. People think they would find that satisfying, if she were caught and punished. You know, when I’m at a reading or something, people will come up to me and are very honest about saying, “I hated the ending!” I always say, “Well, what did you want to have happen?” And it’s like, “I wanted justice!” I promise you, I just don’t think you’d find it satisfying for Amy to end up in a prison cell just sitting in a little box.

I know a lot of readers wish she’d died.

That would have been the other option, to kill her off — but who’s going to do that? I’m not going to have Nick do that. He’s not going to do it. And to have anyone else do it is putting him back in the stage where he started out, which is having other people do his dirty work all the time, so that didn’t work for me either. So you know, I did think it all through, and for me, I’ve always loved those endings of unease.


It’s certainly not the ending that the reader/viewer is expecting—in a sense. However, what makes the climax so fascinating is that, on another level, it is the ending that we expect. It’s the same ending we always expect, in every story.  Really, it’s the famous Hollywood-style happy ending, satirically turned on its head.  Consider, we have a plot wherein the boy wins the girl’s love back, their marriage is saved—they even have a kid! – but because of how terribly distorted these two people have become, all of these conventions are shredded into pieces. The “happy” ending is exactly the ending we don’t want, as something that should be joyous and cathartic has instead been reduced to being utterly loathsome, miserable, disturbing—and painfully unsatisfying.

That’s the genius of it.

Because at it’s core, Gone Girl is a story about masks we wear, as well as the masks that society forces upon us.  Whether it’s wife-killer, “cool girl,” good cop/bad cop, “loving and concerned parents,” or any number of other roles that we play, Gone Girl pulls back the curtain to reveal the potential ugliness that can lie beneath the surface of any well played part.  The titles of “husband” and “wife,” to the two characters in this story, are more than just titles; they’re names, roles to play, roles that must be played correctly.  To them, a “happy” marriage has nothing to do with comfort, and everything to do with performance.  The combination of Amy’s controlling vindictiveness with Nick’s self-conscious weakness is crucial here, because it means that both of them slide into place so easily, yet so falsely, that the end result is both natural and hideously unnatural.  It’s only fitting, in a story like this, that the traditional happy ending is played out in such a perverted fashion.


I think a large part of the alarm that many readers (and now viewers) experience at the ending is because by this point in the story, the tension is so wound-up, so tight, that it seems to require a devastating explosion to equalize it. But that isn’t what happens. Instead, the ending peters out uneasily—and that’s exactly what makes it so good. The tension isn’t resolved, and it might never be. These two people, with all of their psychological issues, are going to be trapped in this horrible union for the rest of their lives.

Or will they?

That’s the question, isn’t it? As the story comes to a close, we see a Nick Dunne who is undergoing a transformation into the “cool guy” counterpart to Amy’s “cool girl,” a fake personality that Amy describes earlier on. Again, consider that this is a story about masks.  Nick, because he can’t not provide for his child, is forced into this box, becoming exactly the person that Amy wants him to be. The “perfect man.”

The inherent problem, of course, is that this can’t last. Just like Amy couldn’t be the cool girl forever, Nick won’t forever succeed at being the perfect man. And when he fails, when his mask finally slips, there’s no telling what might happen.  One gets the strong sense that the events of the novel may precede a greater evil yet to come. As the last page of the novel chillingly illustrates, the future of Amy and Nick’s marriage is likely a dark one.


19 thoughts on “Gone Girl: So, about that ending…

    • Oh yeah, the ending ties everything together in a rather brilliant fashion. As I wrote earlier, I do think it’s the only way that this particular story—with these particular two characters—ever could have ended.

  1. (I finished the book last night!!) I think Amy’s comments on the last page are telling enough and so, even though it’s an “open ending”, in a way it tells us all we need to know. Nick’s comments have planted the seeds for her anger and resentment to build up again, and this is likely going to be a cycle of behavior throughout their marriage. Even if she doesn’t pull off something on that grand and public of a scale again, if they stay together, they both have established their patterns, and I agree that it can’t lead anywhere good. Especially since there’s going to be a child involved. WOW.

    • Oh, I know! While Amy and Nick have plenty to blame themselves for, the character I feel the most sorry for is this unborn child. Can you imagine having those two as parents? Yikes.

      Good point, about the cycle of behavior. It’s a realistic prediction for the future of their relationship, which holds true to the way people actually behave. Forming a relationship partly involves each person “training” the other on how to behave around one another, so the cycle that Amy and Nick have set themselves up for is going to be deadly in one way or another.

  2. I did not read the book, but I saw the film. I was very impressed with Gillian Flynn’s screenplay. From what you had to say about the book, it sounds to me like it was a faithful adaptation and she could score a Best Adapted Screenplay Academy Award nomination. You give good review.

  3. I also bought my copy of the book at an airport but since I already was reading another book didn’t get to read it and stored it someplace. After seeing the movie and the marvelous job of performances, directing and editing of the whole thing; I’m now more than excited to start reading the book!
    Absolutely agree with what you said about the masks because that was the exact same thing I thought about after the credits rolled, specially thinking about the scene about their “meet-cute”, what seemed like poorly acted was actually hypocritical people interacting.

    • Glad to hear it, it’s an excellent book! The movie follows it closely, though the book has more background detail and story to it (as most books do).

      That’s a great point about the “meet-cute” scene. At that party, both characters are, in fact, being “actors.” Both Nick and Amy are portraying themselves in ways that are inaccurate to their actual personalities (as we find out later in the story), but the STAGING for their mutual performance is so familiar that the audience takes the whole thing for granted. Terrific scene!

  4. I’m glad the author stood up for herself about the ending. Too many readers criticize an ending, wanting something that had nothing to do with the spirit of the story or the nature of the characters. They judge the writer with no thought to the storytelling.

  5. I like your review, Nicholas. For me, and first let me say I haven’t read the book, only watched the movie, it was one of the best movies I’d seen in a really long time. The only thing I would criticize, though, is that I think they should have put a little more emphasis on why she was so crazy. It could have been one of a bunch of reasons, but the story with Amazing Amy was perfect in my opinion, there just wasn’t enough emphasis on it.

    • Thanks! And yes, I think the movie’s only real flaw is that there’s a lot of information in the book that the filmmakers weren’t able to fit into the movie’s narrative. Still, this is pretty common when it comes to film adaptations, and Gone Girl did an excellent job at capturing all of the important moments.

      Regarding Amy’s psychopathic (and narcissistic) tendencies, I think that it’s largely due to the way her parents treated her; through their Amazing Amy series, they both put her up on a pedestal and at the same time, continually demonstrated that she wasn’t good enough. Amy was raised to believe that she was the center of the world, and that’s a hard notion to shake when all of the evidence supports it. Though her parents weren’t abusive in any “traditional” way, their actions certainly created a monster. That’s my read on it, anyhow.

  6. Nicholas, right on with your excellent review. I saw the movie and thought, perfect ending! One that makes the mind think of all kinds of after-shock scenarios. It was a psychological thriller and played out true to both characters personality traits & dysfunction. I’m now reading the book to fill in the background story. Seems I tracked the story (as a nurse practitioner in psych) pretty well after reading your review. Love your writing style and how your mind works. Thank you! Christine

Leave a comment!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s